HiResCovers.net

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 9:55 am**

Should lynne be promoted to contributor?

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:14 am**

voted

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:05 pm**

Me too

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:44 pm**

Voted.

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:28 pm**

Voted

I don't know anything about scans.
Only if you see the scan upclose you see a lot of pixels.
seeing you guys and girls reactions, i think it's good enough and that's why i voted yes

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 6:11 pm**

wessim wrote:
QUOTE (wessim @ Sep 12 2011, 07:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Voted

I don't know anything about scans.
Only if you see the scan upclose you see a lot of pixels.
seeing you guys and girls reactions, i think it's good enough and that's why i voted yes

Based on your close-up I'd rejected that cover.

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:31 pm**

Personally I wouldn't have accepted most of those scans, but if someone is just uploading scans on a regular basis, and they meet the criteria then you can't vote no

I am a little more experienced than Lynne, but to give you some comparison this is what a cartoon cover scan should look like

http://www.hirescovers.net/gallery/display...e.php?pid=69537

and this is a scanned film cover

http://www.hirescovers.net/gallery/display...e.php?pid=61844

I wouldn't expect them to be this good, but then I wouldn't want to download and print any of her scans

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:28 pm**

voted..

.

Posted: **Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:45 pm**

I agree with MrHenryDog... I think the scans are good enough to approve contributor status, but I would hope that perhaps some experienced scanners would then help lynne out with some tips and pointers on how to improve his/her(?) scans. I'd rather not see our gallery become cluttered with $hitty scans that you might find on some of those cheap, crappy cover sites. :whistle:

Voted yes with the hope that scanning quality improves with upgraded status.

Posted: **Tue Sep 13, 2011 1:13 am**

Voted