HiResCovers.net

Just my opinion but I think you can do without the ink splatters if possible to me it looks like dropped coffee of your masterpiece. i'd tone it done again to where they're not noticeable. can't wait too see what your done to do for the back and the rest of the collection.

Some people want the splatters... some people don't... ugh! I don't know what to think!!!

Here it is with and without splatter. No other changes, I just turned off the splatter layer. Splatter or no splatter? I kind of like splatter, but whatever...

[attachment=13302:uls_fran...splatter.jpg]

I like the one without the splatter to me it just looks better. You could always compromise and make one with and one with out like i did with bad moon.
it wouldn't be your first movie with two different covers.

either way your the artist and it'll be your masterpiece.

I like it with the splatter, and really like how this is shaping up

I'm with Voetz, i say keep the splatters!

I still don't understand what is so exciting about splatters?

maybe we can compromise and reduce the amount of splatters around the right side of the monsters face.
I think then the splatters would cool.

RRJR84 wrote:

QUOTE (RRJR84 @ Aug 24 2010, 03:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I still don't understand what is so exciting about splatters?

Someone else want to field that question since I'm very biased towards splatters.

personally i like the splatters too, it also helps with bringing out the TT, darkening it around boris's name.

kernie82 wrote:

QUOTE (kernie82 @ Aug 24 2010, 09:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Someone else want to field that question since I'm very biased towards splatters.

He's new on the scene, let him discover

I love the splatter. Keep it.

For me it adds visual interest to the cover. All uniform and clean is boring so the splatter spices it up a bit. And as I said earlier it it reminds me of spilled ink and these were literary works first. For me that makes a nice connection between the movies and the books.