Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:36 pm
Love your keyart work kernie, if i had the room n money i would get them all printed out as decent wall posters 
HiResCovers.net
The home of DVD, Blu-ray, Ultra-HD 4k replacement custom cover art work
https://www.hirescovers.net:443/forum/
The Comic Book Collection by Kernie
Page 308 of 513
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:43 pm
You have been a busy boy! These look so good
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 7:47 pm
Excellent keyart for all 4 covers 
Your spoiling us again 
Thanks so much, wonderful
Your spoiling us again Thanks so much, wonderfulPosted: Sun Jan 15, 2017 7:59 pm
as always a wonderful job wowow cool thank you so much
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:13 am
Great stuff Kernie, I have your JJ cover in black case, now I have to re-print, that's OK though.
[attachment=35207:JJ_Kernie.jpg]
[attachment=35207:JJ_Kernie.jpg]
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 3:25 am
Oh, that Jessica Jones update is spectacular. Thanks for all the new covers, great new additions!
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 9:57 am
Hi,
Kernie's work is fantastic, I love seeing it, just like the rest of you - it's stunning, count me as a big fan.
One thing I can't get my head around, though - and this isn't a criticism of Kernie - is why what I call 'character montages' are so popular, especially for front pages. What I mean by this is when you get lots of characters, in daft, unrelated poses, amalgamated together into one fake image. It seems pretty ubiquitous, not just here, so I'm obviously pretty much alone in disliking it.
It's just a personal preference so please don't attack me for having an opinion but I don't really understand the appeal of combining multiple images like this. Is it just me that thinks it generally makes the characters look dumb-a$$? The only time this works in my eyes is either for spoof movies - where dumb-a$$ is what you're aiming for - or comic-book stuff, which is maybe why I love Kernie's work, despite the montages.
Take the 'keyart' Kernie recently posted: do these look good with multiple characters and their silly, over-the-shoulder glances? Everyone seems to love them, though. Is it really just me that doesn't? Probably, I guess. Then maybe it's a good thing I like my images kept simple, it aligns with my simple level of talent!
Anyway, great work Kernie - no surprise to see it's so popular.
Kernie's work is fantastic, I love seeing it, just like the rest of you - it's stunning, count me as a big fan.
One thing I can't get my head around, though - and this isn't a criticism of Kernie - is why what I call 'character montages' are so popular, especially for front pages. What I mean by this is when you get lots of characters, in daft, unrelated poses, amalgamated together into one fake image. It seems pretty ubiquitous, not just here, so I'm obviously pretty much alone in disliking it.
It's just a personal preference so please don't attack me for having an opinion but I don't really understand the appeal of combining multiple images like this. Is it just me that thinks it generally makes the characters look dumb-a$$? The only time this works in my eyes is either for spoof movies - where dumb-a$$ is what you're aiming for - or comic-book stuff, which is maybe why I love Kernie's work, despite the montages.
Take the 'keyart' Kernie recently posted: do these look good with multiple characters and their silly, over-the-shoulder glances? Everyone seems to love them, though. Is it really just me that doesn't? Probably, I guess. Then maybe it's a good thing I like my images kept simple, it aligns with my simple level of talent!
Anyway, great work Kernie - no surprise to see it's so popular.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 12:14 pm
Yup, I think you are totally on your own here WeakySneasel. I also fail to see why you have chosen Kernies thread to highlight your dislike for these style of montages?
As you say, everyone has their opinion, and the world would be a boring place if we all agreed on everything. But please keep threads on topic.
As you say, everyone has their opinion, and the world would be a boring place if we all agreed on everything. But please keep threads on topic.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:02 pm
[attachment=35209:facepalm.gif]
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 1:17 pm
QUOTE Yup, I think you are totally on your own here WeakySneasel. I also fail to see why you have chosen Kernie's thread to highlight your dislike for these style of montages?[/quote]
Sorry, no offence was intended, I merely chose it because he makes something I'm not usually keen on, work so brilliantly well - it was intended as praise, albeit poorly aimed. Didn't mean to wander off topic. Zip!
Sorry, no offence was intended, I merely chose it because he makes something I'm not usually keen on, work so brilliantly well - it was intended as praise, albeit poorly aimed. Didn't mean to wander off topic. Zip!