Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 2:38 pm
by ctaulbee
I'd add couple of words but other than that looks fine.
QUOTE
at our discretion
• You must be an active member making regular contributions over the last several weeks, to apply for contributor status. New contributors will also be monitored for regular uploads. If we feel you are not regularly contributing, after becoming a contributor, we reserve the right to remove your contributor access
at our discretion. This is to prevent members gaining free access to the site, without continuing to contribute.[/quote]
I see no reason not to
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 3:45 pm
by Jazzy
Yeah! Go for both...
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:06 pm
by Speedz0r
Yeah same here! Sometimes you just got to admire the brilliance of CT
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 6:36 pm
by bazzah
Speedz0r wrote:QUOTE (Speedz0r @ Dec 3 2017, 04:06 PM) Yeah same here! Sometimes you just got to admire the brilliance of CT
Don't tell him that!!
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 6:49 pm
by Speedz0r
Well, he did just yesterday get a lot wiser so why not?
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:17 pm
by ctaulbee
There you go Speed you tell him!
BTW if anyone is interested I found a picture of Baz from back in his younger days when he was in his pansy greaser stage...
[attachment=38086:Baz.jpg]
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:57 pm
by sauron
ctaulbee wrote:QUOTE (ctaulbee @ Dec 3 2017, 02:08 PM) I think there should be a new rule that does nothing to change how things are currently and would solve this problem, you may recall I have mentioned this before Baz.
What you do is you provide yourself with a way out, right now once you update some one you are locked in until the site downgrades them which is far too long in my opinion.
Simply adding a new guideline that says "new contributors will be on probation for the first three months and if their activity falls below what we consider acceptable they will be downgraded at the site admins discretion."
Nothing wrong with that and we don't have that many new contributors and we will notice if they stop right after they are upgraded and if they do fall off right away during their first three months as a contributor and we feel upgrading them was a mistake then we have a way to downgrade them and be done with it, problem solved.
This gives us the freedom to upgrade the new folks after a week or two if we want and still have a way to close them down in the next month if they fall off, and also we would then have reason to make them prove their self more should they try for it again in the future.
I think that is a great idea!