djsvb20 contributor request

This thread is only visible to artists. Please use this thread to post your opinions on new members posting in the 'prove yourself' section. Feel free to start new topics for new users.
User avatar
Jazzy
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 12:09 am
Location: Trois-Rivières, Québec.
Contact:

Post by Jazzy »

That is exactly my point Curt. On the button,
User avatar
sauron
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 12:17 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by sauron »

That sounds good to me :)

Is there any quick way to find out if they have had any rejects or is it a simple case of going through the rejected folder?
User avatar
ctaulbee
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 8220
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: The Realm of Nightmares
Contact:

Post by ctaulbee »

If the item is updated and then approved it won't be in that folder.

I think it shows if there are any approval comments on each item in the gallery for staff, it will be in () right after the name of the person who approved it so it would be a matter of looking at recent items by staff.

If a item was re-uploaded vs replacing the original rejected item then it could in fact be missed via the above check, unless someone were to check the rejects as well.

That's a minor issue anyway, I can create a function that will search both areas by user and date, to see if there have been any in the last XX days.
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
My Gallery • Please leave a like and short comment if you download my work, thanks. • My Criterion Collection
User avatar
sauron
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 12541
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 12:17 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by sauron »

ctaulbee wrote:
QUOTE (ctaulbee @ Dec 27 2016, 10:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If the item is updated and then approved it won't be in that folder.

I think it shows if there are any approval comments on each item in the gallery for staff, it will be in () right after the name of the person who approved it so it would be a matter of looking at recent items by staff.

If a item was re-uploaded vs replacing the original rejected item then it could in fact be missed via the above check, unless someone were to check the rejects as well.

That's a minor issue anyway, I can create a function that will search both areas by user and date, to see if there have been any in the last XX days.


Awesome, that would be good and could also be used to clean up the rejected items as well, a lot of people just re-upload rather than replace.
User avatar
bazzah
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 23743
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Post by bazzah »

ctaulbee wrote:
QUOTE (ctaulbee @ Dec 27 2016, 06:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would suggest adding at least these as rules.

1. All label submissions for contributor status must be unique (in our opinion) ie no similar versions in the gallery already.

2. Must be a active member making regular contributions over last three(3) months to apply for contributor status.

3. Must have had no gallery rejects in the last 30 days.



I am not 100% sure about point 3. If an item has been rejected and replaced, I see that as a good thing. It shows that we can all make mistakes, but importantly this member is willing to improve on their mistakes.
User avatar
ctaulbee
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 8220
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: The Realm of Nightmares
Contact:

Post by ctaulbee »

I suppose since contributors uploads are not auto approved it would be less of an issue ;)
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
My Gallery • Please leave a like and short comment if you download my work, thanks. • My Criterion Collection
User avatar
bazzah
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 23743
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Post by bazzah »

So, do we all agree the rules should be updated with these points?

1. All label submissions for contributor status must be unique (in our opinion) ie no similar versions in the gallery already.

2. Must be a active member making regular contributions over last three(3) months to apply for contributor status.
User avatar
Fidi
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 3117
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 6:07 am
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Contact:

Post by Fidi »

Very good additions in my opinion as well.
But why not something similar for covers as well?
My MD Gallery
User avatar
bazzah
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 23743
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: Home
Contact:

Post by bazzah »

I think we don't have a problem with 'similar' covers. The problem arises with posters being used to make labels, as it is very easy to copy and paste a poster into a template.
User avatar
ctaulbee
HiRes Uber Member
Posts: 8220
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 5:03 pm
Location: The Realm of Nightmares
Contact:

Post by ctaulbee »

Bazzah wrote:
QUOTE (Bazzah @ Dec 28 2016, 12:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I think we don't have a problem with 'similar' covers. The problem arises with posters being used to make labels, as it is very easy to copy and paste a poster into a template.


:iamwithstupid:
ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage
My Gallery • Please leave a like and short comment if you download my work, thanks. • My Criterion Collection
Post Reply

Return to “Artist opinion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests