Kernie wrote:QUOTE (Kernie @ May 10 2014, 12:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Because it wasn't released by Paramount or Universal. It was the first Marvel film outside of the original Paramount contract and fully distributed by Disney. To their credit, Disney has been largely leaving their logo off of the Marvel films that they have been associated with and allowing the Marvel Studios logo to stand on its own.
At least that's my assumption for Cirus' decision...![]()
Oh right - fair enough, thought maybe Cirus had missed it off but that makes sense
Avengers assemble
- sauron
- HiRes Uber Member
- Posts: 12541
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 12:17 pm
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
- Cirus
- HiRes Uber Member
- Posts: 1416
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:04 am
- Location: Kecskemét, Hungary
- Contact:
Kernie wrote:QUOTE (Kernie @ May 10 2014, 01:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Because it wasn't released by Paramount or Universal. It was the first Marvel film outside of the original Paramount contract and fully distributed by Disney. To their credit, Disney has been largely leaving their logo off of the Marvel films that they have been associated with and allowing the Marvel Studios logo to stand on its own.
At least that's my assumption for Cirus' decision...![]()
BTW, this set looks amazing, Cirus!
This is precisely why I left it off the Paramount logo.
- JollyRoger
- HiRes Uber Member
- Posts: 13911
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:43 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

