Demonology wrote:QUOTE (Demonology @ Apr 11 2014, 03:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I also thought the front only idea worked really well, it was alot tougher than doing a whole cover due to each individual artist
had to be more creative to make that image pop. However when i first seen what the contest was going to be i couldn't help but
think that it would have probably even more interesting if it was a case of designing a poster instead at 3000 x 2000 pixels.
Results could have more interesting when a coversite like hires could have incorporated it into another comp with option of just using the BR entry posterarts instead.
I totally agree and a really good idea with a poster, it could be fun
Cover Site Battle Royal 4!
- wysmommy
- HiRes Uber Member
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 1:54 am
- Location: Way out there
- Contact:
I would prefer Full covers next year. I think it benefits the cover sites more as well. I mean, honestly, how many people do you think will actually finish and upload their BR covers this year? Last year, after the BR ended, I saw tons of uploads for the Argo covers, and a few Titanic covers too. Just my two cents, anyhoo. 

garot wrote:QUOTE (garot @ Apr 12 2014, 01:44 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>Hi all!
Many thanks for voting to my cover! Thank you all!
Its great to win with Zungam, great job my friend![]()
Also big THX to Tim for CSBR4, fantastic work!
I must create back and spine to my cover and when im done, i upload for all![]()
I look forward to seeing it. It's a stunning front you created
I agree with full covers for next year. Strangely I think it would make it easier for the judges too
I also think one judge from each site, with perhaps 3 impartial judges. Public voting towards the results is a big no no! As we find here, most public votes are cast from just seeing previews without examining the work closely. That can lead to unfair results.
Joe, I can only speak for myself, but I had no idea whose cover was whose. I thought I had guessed a few, but it turned out I was totally wrong! But maybe from that perspective there should just be a select handful of judges who are not biased towards any site? I know I would never score my own designers higher (if I had managed to figure out which covers were theirs) but it is understandable that people will always presume I would.
Tim, please don't think I am complaining at all about the BR! It is a fantastic competition and you do an amazing job running it! It is a lot of hard work you put into it each year. I am just sharing my opinion on how a fantastic competition could be even better
I also think one judge from each site, with perhaps 3 impartial judges. Public voting towards the results is a big no no! As we find here, most public votes are cast from just seeing previews without examining the work closely. That can lead to unfair results.
Joe, I can only speak for myself, but I had no idea whose cover was whose. I thought I had guessed a few, but it turned out I was totally wrong! But maybe from that perspective there should just be a select handful of judges who are not biased towards any site? I know I would never score my own designers higher (if I had managed to figure out which covers were theirs) but it is understandable that people will always presume I would.
Tim, please don't think I am complaining at all about the BR! It is a fantastic competition and you do an amazing job running it! It is a lot of hard work you put into it each year. I am just sharing my opinion on how a fantastic competition could be even better

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest