nok wrote:QUOTE (nok @ Dec 29 2012, 04:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>I really really love this cover, Kernie!
Only comment I have is that I miss John Blake somewhere on the coverhis role in TDKR was too big to leave him out
![]()
Sorry, but John Blake isn't going anywhere near this cover. Yes, he had a big role in TDKR, but I hate the role he played. I like Joseph Gordon Levitt, but with an entire universe of Batman characters to pull from, why Nolan felt he had to create a brand new character to inherit Wayne's legacy is beyond me.
If I were to include him, where would I even be able to fit him in?
The Dark Knight Legacy
Thanks, nike! Any last suggestions before I start wrapping this one up?
- I brightened the whole cover, just giving it a slight level adjustment.
- Upped the saturation on the stills
- Removed the cars from the front keyart to help hide perspective/scale issues
- Added some Joker cards at the Joker's feet.
I still feel the back is a little bland... at least compared to my other covers. This is a much less dynamic layout than what I'm used to doing. Keeping everything very rectangular and grid-based, with nothing slanted or rotated at an angle, is very different for me. Which is probably why I got so stalled with it. I'm really not sure what else to do with it, but because it's a bit more "simple" and restrained than some of my other layouts, I'm not sure if it's imaginative enough for my standards. Does anyone else mind that the stills are just kind of lined up in a row and that the text is placed inside boring ol' rectangles?
[attachment=24080:darkknig...view_010.jpg]
- I brightened the whole cover, just giving it a slight level adjustment.
- Upped the saturation on the stills
- Removed the cars from the front keyart to help hide perspective/scale issues
- Added some Joker cards at the Joker's feet.
I still feel the back is a little bland... at least compared to my other covers. This is a much less dynamic layout than what I'm used to doing. Keeping everything very rectangular and grid-based, with nothing slanted or rotated at an angle, is very different for me. Which is probably why I got so stalled with it. I'm really not sure what else to do with it, but because it's a bit more "simple" and restrained than some of my other layouts, I'm not sure if it's imaginative enough for my standards. Does anyone else mind that the stills are just kind of lined up in a row and that the text is placed inside boring ol' rectangles?
[attachment=24080:darkknig...view_010.jpg]
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Kernie on Sat Dec 29, 2012 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Guess I'm one of those that didn't know what to say, but before you had your little break, I thought the front was good enough to be complete, and that the back would have come easy for you, guess I was wrong there, but I like what you have done, I felt that Alfred, Fox and Gordon should have been on the cover somewhere so I was pleased to see them on the back.
You have the main protagonist of the trilogy on the cover, the characters of Blake, Tate, and Dawes (apart from being played by two actresses) I feel where only secondary characters and could be left out.
I agree with Kernie regarding John Blake, with all the varied characters in the Batman universe why did Nolan create a new character to take on the cowl. Though Robin wasn't seen in this universe you have Dick Grayson that was the first Robin, then Jason Todd, for the third there was Tim Drake, the forth a girl Stephanie Brown, then Damian Wayne, the child of Bruce and Talia.
My choice for the character played by Gordon-Levitt would have been Jason Todd, only by name and not to follow the story arc of the comic book Jason Todd. Yes there are similarities between the characters of Todd, Grayson and the new Blake as in they where all orphans, Grayson joined the Gotham City Police Department and like Tim Drake, John Blake discovers that Bruce Wayne is actually Batman.
So apart from the circus connection John Blake is a combination of all 3 of the characters that played Robin, but still I'm not sure way Nolan felt it a necessity to invent a new character to put into this role.
Anyhow enough of the waffling the cover looks exceptional
well done
You have the main protagonist of the trilogy on the cover, the characters of Blake, Tate, and Dawes (apart from being played by two actresses) I feel where only secondary characters and could be left out.
I agree with Kernie regarding John Blake, with all the varied characters in the Batman universe why did Nolan create a new character to take on the cowl. Though Robin wasn't seen in this universe you have Dick Grayson that was the first Robin, then Jason Todd, for the third there was Tim Drake, the forth a girl Stephanie Brown, then Damian Wayne, the child of Bruce and Talia.
My choice for the character played by Gordon-Levitt would have been Jason Todd, only by name and not to follow the story arc of the comic book Jason Todd. Yes there are similarities between the characters of Todd, Grayson and the new Blake as in they where all orphans, Grayson joined the Gotham City Police Department and like Tim Drake, John Blake discovers that Bruce Wayne is actually Batman.
So apart from the circus connection John Blake is a combination of all 3 of the characters that played Robin, but still I'm not sure way Nolan felt it a necessity to invent a new character to put into this role.
Anyhow enough of the waffling the cover looks exceptional
well doneThanks DS. I'm glad I'm not the only one who doesn't care for the characters Nolan created specifically for his films.
Ducard and Tate are fine, because they were simply misdirecting aliases for characters that actually exist in the Batman universe. But Dawes and Blake were uninteresting tangents that took us away from the canon characters.
Well, if there are no more suggestions, I'll call this one done and start to convert to DVD (just for you, RRJR), even though I hate converting from BD to DVD. Man, when are you going to bite the bullet and go blu-ray already??
Ducard and Tate are fine, because they were simply misdirecting aliases for characters that actually exist in the Batman universe. But Dawes and Blake were uninteresting tangents that took us away from the canon characters.
Well, if there are no more suggestions, I'll call this one done and start to convert to DVD (just for you, RRJR), even though I hate converting from BD to DVD. Man, when are you going to bite the bullet and go blu-ray already??

Last edited by Kernie on Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bunny Dojo
- HiRes Uber Member
- Posts: 2725
- Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 4:44 am
- Contact:
What are your thoughts on boosting the saturation and/or contrast of the whole thing? It may take things further away from the film style, but, with all of the work you've put into these pieces, it's hard not to want to see them jump out more. Similarly, changing the title text to white could add another bit of contrast to the mix.
[attachment=24082:tdk.jpg]
[attachment=24082:tdk.jpg]
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Bunny Dojo wrote:QUOTE (Bunny Dojo @ Dec 29 2012, 06:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>What are your thoughts on boosting the saturation and/or contrast of the whole thing? It may take things further away from the film style, but, with all of the work you've put into these pieces, it's hard not to want to see them jump out more. Similarly, changing the title text to white could add another bit of contrast to the mix.
[attachment=24082:tdk.jpg]
Hmmm... I'm not sure. What do others think about Tim's suggestions?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests