HiResCovers.net

by **mr_cyclone** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 9:17 pm

thanks everyone so much i really appreciate it alot.

by **bazzah** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:26 pm

Congratulations, and welcome to the contributor group. I have to tell you, at first the guys were voting against you being a contributor. But due to the improvement, and willingness to improve you have shown, they have changed their minds! Keep up the great work!

by **mr_cyclone** » Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:04 pm

added a new dvd cover here is the link to it

http://www.hirescovers.net/gallery/display....php?pos=-41959

so this are the scanned covers i've posted so far

by **mr_cyclone** » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:31 pm

i finished doing some work on all the covers exept Pulse because i didnt really see nothing wrong with that one so i replaced most of the covers just right now, Just Friends i deleted that one and i would like to replace it with the new cover i posted yesterday The Assasination Of Jesse James if thats ok with everyone...

MrHenryDog wrote:
QUOTE(MrHenryDog @ Feb 11 2008, 10:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
thats a lot better.
scannign at 600 increases detail but also increases moire.(the patteren effect) most people who scn at 600 reduce the image to 300 before filtering it. personally i scan at 300 to begin..personal choice.

by **MrHenryDog** » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:25 pm

thats a lot better.
scannign at 600 increases detail but also increases moire.(the patteren effect) most people who scn at 600 reduce the image to 300 before filtering it. personally i scan at 300 to begin..personal choice.

by **mr_cyclone** » Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:05 pm

would this cover be more acceptable or will it be the same like the other ones i posted, i did it last night

http://www.hirescovers.net/gallery/display....php?pos=-41832

by **mr_cyclone** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:32 pm

yeah im a try and fix my covers like u showed me on the image of undefeated, ill try to do a cover a little later and ill see the difference between 300 and 600 and see which one is better because i thought 600 was the way to do it but diffrent sites and people have diffrent rules and tips i suppose. here i just did a little test a fast one between 600 and 300

MrHenryDog wrote:
QUOTE(MrHenryDog @ Feb 10 2008, 03:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
what im talking about is improving the overall look. I have taken an image from undefeated just to show you. obviously the results with any scan depend on a number of things, but try to get it as good as you can

you may be creating problems for yourself by scanning at 600 dpi, try reducing the scan to 300 before you do anything

by **MrHenryDog** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:20 pm

what im talking about is improving the overall look. I have taken an image from undefeated just to show you. obviously the results with any scan depend on a number of things, but try to get it as good as you can

you may be creating problems for yourself by scanning at 600 dpi, try reducing the scan to 300 before you do anything

by **mr_cyclone** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:18 pm

oh on just friends i had to redo the whole bottom part because when i scanned it the text came out really choppy that if u printed it out you wouldnt of been able to read it so i tryed my best to do it like the original but i can easly post another cover and remove this one till i can do it better and well my scans i do them at 600dpi to try and fix as much as possible then make them the right size and make them look good but i guess thats my mistake since i do my covers at 600 but like ive said im still new at this so it will take a while to learn more and i dont mean to be rude but i dont download covers and rebuild them as my own like you mentioned at the bottom i scan my own covers and fix them if u want a pictures of proofs i be happy to show you.

B3ARStyLE wrote:
QUOTE(B3ARStyLE @ Feb 10 2008, 02:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm no master-scanner myself, but I don't understand how the plot can come out crystal clear when the spine-logo's are plagued with scan-dots.
Let me just demonstrate an example, comparing your "scan" of Just Friends.. and another one I found. Which by the way, has the "normal" scan-artifact.

I really don't mean to come off as a "narc" or anything.. It's just that the covers you've uploaded, show signifigant signs of halfassed rebuilds.
And add to this, I'm pretty sure you havn't scanned the covers yourself...

by **BearStyle** » Sun Feb 10, 2008 10:37 pm

mr_cyclone wrote:
QUOTE(mr_cyclone @ Feb 11 2008, 08:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
when you say semi rebuild do you mean i added the text to both covers because the covers came like that i didnt rebuild or anything to it?

I'm no master-scanner myself, but I don't understand how the plot can come out crystal clear when the spine-logo's are plagued with scan-dots.
Let me just demonstrate an example, comparing your "scan" of Just Friends.. and another one I found. Which by the way, has the "normal" scan-artifact.

[attachment=2605:just_friends.jpg]

I really don't mean to come off as a "narc" or anything.. It's just that the covers you've uploaded, show signifigant signs of halfassed rebuilds.
And add to this, I'm pretty sure you havn't scanned the covers yourself...

HiResCovers.net

Contributing

Post a reply

Expand view Topic review: Contributing