by Speedz0r » Sat Oct 12, 2019 11:51 am
Fantastic work and research Mr. Dojo, thank you for going thoroughly through his uploads. Also great work Baz for doing a great google search of the user. Shouldn't scans be "actual scans"? So the person actually has to own the movie as a Blu-Ray/DVD/4K UHD film that comes in a case with the original cover, and then they scan that cover and uploads it to the site? For me some of these are not actual "scanned covers" and imo should therefore been rejected and or uploaded as customs or ("edited scans") and only accepted if they are in order with all the rules. Based on the fact that he sells counterfeit movies, he most likely does not buy the actual films, but rather downloads them and then burn them out for him to sell/keep, also tells us that he doesn't actually own the cover that he supposedly has "scanned". From looking at just a couple of his covers, most of them seem to be okay but due to the variety of quality in some of the uploads it seems more likely that it's not actually his work, but others that he's just chosen to upload in order to get free access once his subscription runs out as mentioned above. Surely we should not reward this kind of "behavior"? He has a 50% warn ratio already and the number of downloads vs uploads are insane. His IP also seems to be changing quite a lot, so I wouldn't be surprised if this is a shared account. I rather just have the member removed tbh.
Fantastic work and research Mr. Dojo, thank you for going thoroughly through his uploads. Also great work Baz for doing a great google search of the user. Shouldn't scans be "actual scans"? So the person actually has to own the movie as a Blu-Ray/DVD/4K UHD film that comes in a case with the original cover, and then they scan that cover and uploads it to the site? For me some of these are not actual "scanned covers" and imo should therefore been rejected and or uploaded as customs or ("edited scans") and only accepted if they are in order with all the rules. Based on the fact that he sells counterfeit movies, he most likely does not buy the actual films, but rather downloads them and then burn them out for him to sell/keep, also tells us that he doesn't actually own the cover that he supposedly has "scanned". From looking at just a couple of his covers, most of them seem to be okay but due to the variety of quality in some of the uploads it seems more likely that it's not actually his work, but others that he's just chosen to upload in order to get free access once his subscription runs out as mentioned above. Surely we should not reward this kind of "behavior"? He has a 50% warn ratio already and the number of downloads vs uploads are insane. His IP also seems to be changing quite a lot, so I wouldn't be surprised if this is a shared account. I rather just have the member removed tbh.