Misunderstanding Or Not

Post a reply

Confirmation code
Enter the code exactly as it appears. All letters are case insensitive.
Smilies
:iamwithstupid: :yellow: :welcome: :waving: :cheers: :innocent: :jump: :whistle: :D :) :bootyshake: :icon_smile: :no: :angel: :yes: :p ;) :agree: :( :nunu: :Happybirthday: :outtahere: :flypig: :yessir: :love: :eek: :lsmile: :cool: :lol: :lolboard: :lol2: :sponge1: :hippo: :notsure: :compwindow: :thumbdown: :doctor: :rolleyes: :thumb: :stick: :toot: :band: :spam: :artist: :rulez: :surprised: :razz: :cry: :norway-flag-banana: :rain: :jolly: :cigar: :banana-santa: :redface: :biggrin: :exclaim: :award: :golf: :grin: :ashamed: :Belgium-xs: :putt: :laughin: :38: :giggle: :banrock: :grr: :hysterical: :cussing: :blink: :gimp: :AR15firing: :bottom: :Pulling hair: :skipadedodah2: :beer: :hrc-flag-banana: :Owl: :shrug: :52: :rofl: :bandance: :loser: :bansplit: :la: :chair: :blowkiss: :aussie: :cool2: :b-drum: :goodidea: :german-flag-banana: :yeahthat: :whip: :lmao: :yeah: :scared: :laughing: :hungary-flag-banana: :belgium-flag-banana: :yourock: :facepalm: :party: :Confused: :sfun_weeee: :mutty_snicker: :welcomewave: :swiss-flag-banana: :french-flag-banana: :insane_laugh: :thanks: :smileyagree: :beatdeadhorse: :violin: :wowsmiley: :BunnyDojo: :poo: :United-Kingdom-xs: :United-States-xs: :France-xs: :brit-flag-banana: :finnish-flag-banana: :us-flag-banana: :quebec-flag-banana: :corgi: :wonkey: :point_down: :14: :hcdance: :goodboy: :neener: :jumper: :aceterminator: :sponge1p: :sponge1pi2: :spongeg: :devil: :canadian-flag-banana-smiley-emo :sponge1pR: :sponge1pPiR: :denmark-flag-banana: :jr: :Tumbleweed:
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

If you wish to attach one or more files enter the details below.

Maximum filesize per attachment: 1 MiB.

Expand view Topic review: Misunderstanding Or Not

by bazzah » Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:37 am

Well, we are in total agreement with you. It is unfair that someone is allowed the same access as those who are working hard to create, and prove themselves. We do have rules here, and it seems most members do not take the time to read them.

So, we are going to toughen up on offenders. Firstly, contributors will have to demonstrate their own work. It is not fair on the people sat at home for hours on end, creating covers, to be put into the same category as people who download others work. While we do appreciate you taking the time to upload covers that aren't yours, it isn't exactly that difficult. For example, Chefjoe who started this thread, is working very hard to create covers, but is in the contributor group. So, if people are categorised the same as him, that only upload others work, what is the point in him creating covers? He may as well just upload everyone else’s.

As for people who upload other creator’s work, without giving credit, this is going to be the process. First, you will receive a PM advising you to read the site rules. 2nd offense will result in an official warning. 3rd offense will result in another official warning, and warned next will be a ban. 4th offense will be a ban.

by Raiderviking » Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:15 am

I put forth the idea of creating 2 new catogories of membership. Uploader and Master Uploader.

Uploader - Gives you access to the gallery but not the Arcade. A member who belongs to this group uploads either scans or other ppls work WITH permission of the original artist. Original artist must give his/hers approval directly to the management of Hires, not through the uploader. All uploads has to be approved by management for quality issues.

Master Uploader - Similar to Artists or Residents even. Uploads scans of the highest quality, has never had anything turned down and uploads regularly (atleast once a week). Full access to the website.


To me a contributer creates his or her own art and contribute that to the community... somebody who just uploads somebody elses hard work should'nt have the same access in my opinion. Copying is easy... creating is hard.

by bazzah » Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:14 am

Hey, who said you weren't gonna get beat up anyway?? 8824.gif

Filmboy and I are having a long discussion about all this right now! winking.gif

by chefjoe » Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:10 am

Thanks you guy's I was afraid I'd get beat up for this thread.

by bazzah » Thu Jul 06, 2006 7:39 am

The particular member you are talking about, slipped through the net. They were reduced to a contributor yesterday. I agree that we need to reconsider the contributor group. We have tried to make it so that people contributing to the site do not have to pay. But, as you say, it is too easy to download someone elses work, and uploads it. It is equaly unfair that other contributors are working hard to create their own.

by Irrob » Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:54 am

A legitimate rant. This is touchy stuff but I agree with everything you wrote. I hope this situation does not lead to further abuse of the system.

by chefjoe » Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:14 am

Ok, guess I'll go on and say what alot of us are wondering. Why are people being givin access (full) for uploading other people's covers? Last night I counted at least 12 covers with the help of an artist member that were posted as someone else's work, at least I saw nothing giving credit to the original artist until this after this was exposed in the shout box. I was later told that they had in fact permission and had given credit. OK, fine but still I noticed that the person had been given artist status. How can anyone trust the uploads after something like that? I don't know about everyone but I've been workin my ass off doin 3 and 4 covers w/ labels a day, that way I'll feel justified as a member contributer. I'm very proud of that, and just plain happy to be involved. If u look at the past comments gallery there is simply a crazy number of comments from folks saying the work is someone other than who posted it. Enough I'm ranting now, workin up some stuff for the contest. chin.gif eek5.gif whistle.gif chin.gif cheers.gif

Top